Having an efficient milking routine not only reduces time spent in the parlour and costs but also promotes good udd… https://t.co/hus1WlEFWG
I'm a 25-year-old looking for a job milking or working with calves. I have plenty experience milking on both rotar… https://t.co/uwFkcjVhE1
The November 2020 edition of Milk Manager News is now available to download and read on the FAS website.… https://t.co/9X77djgaMb
Will Wilson, from ARK Agriculture UK, says: “From research, many clamps in the UK are well over 60 years old. What farmers were doing 60 years ago and what they are doing today has changed phenomenally, yet the silage clamps are still the same.
When calculating the size of clamp required, feed-out rate and capacity are the most important things to take into account. You should be asking how much you want to store and how quickly you are going to empty the clamp.
Tonnes of silage produced should be converted into metres cubed, working on a basis of grass silage being approximately 0.6 tonnes/m3 and maize silage being approximately 0.7 t/m3 to give a required capacity.
Feed-out rate is calculated by working out the volume of silage and the period it will be taken out of the clamp. The feed-out rate is the speed in which the silage face would move backwards from the front to the back of the clamp. This is dictated by the height and width of the clamp and the number of days the clamp will be emptied over.
To avoid excessive spoilage due to the silage face being too large and feed-out rate being too slow, it is important to target a minimum of 3m/week feed-out rate. The way to increase feed-out rate and promote better quality silage is to make the clamp narrower and longer or build more bays.
There are three basic options available to farmers when planning a new silage clamp, each with their advantages and disadvantages:
Vertical-walled clamp: One of the big advantages of a vertical wall clamp is space, they don’t take up as much space as clamps with sloped walls. They are also usually very cost effective. It is relatively easy to find a local contractor to build a vertical silage clamp wall.
However, a big disadvantage seen with vertical-walled clamps is safety.
Rarely is there proper accommodation for people working on top of the pit,If you have a four-metre vertical wall, you could easily fall off it, or a tractor could roll off it.
Another problem often seen with vertical walled silage clamps is failing walls.
The weight of machinery used to compact clamps today is significantly higher than a conventional silage clamp was ever designed to hold, and many are still being built to the same specifications as years ago, however the weight they are being required to take is greatly increased.
The pressure from the compacted silage within the clamp is pushed out and through the walls, which often have nothing behind them to give them extra reinforcement. Once they are overloaded they are easily moved, making them weaker and allowing for leakage of effluent.
Sloping-walled clamp: One of the major benefits of a sloping walled clamp is safety. They are safer to operate off, with banks providing an exit route in case of emergency and tractors are able to drive off the side banks if required.
Another advantage is the ability to ensure consistent compaction throughout the clamp.
With sloping walled clamps, tractor wheels are able to compact silage right up to the wall. The walls slope away from the vehicle, making it easy to reach every part to ensure consistent quality throughout the clamp. Overloading of walls is not an issue, as the weight from inside the clamp is dissipated throughout the banks at either side of the clamp. This makes them much stronger than vertical-walled clamps, and they can easily accommodate the pressure generated by large tractors and machinery.
Another benefit is that tyres or gravel bags can be left in-situ on the banks of the clamp so they are where they are needed, improving the ease of clamp covering.
However, more space is required when building a clamp with sloping walls, the walls, including surrounding slopes can span seven metres on either side of the clamp.
Cost can be another disadvantage. Sloped wall clamps can be more expensive if clay to construct the slopes are not already available on site and have to be imported.
Flat-pad clamp: Flat-pad clamps can be very cost effective, requiring no more than a concrete or asphalt base.
However, more space is required to store the same amount of silage as it is not restricted by outer walls, which can also make it difficult to achieve desirable compaction.
The sides of the silage on a flat-pad clamp can become very steep, making it difficult to cover and make an airtight seal over the silage, however solutions are available.
Finding the appropriate site
When it comes to finding the perfect site, In the first instance you should make the site fit the silage clamp, not the other way round.
Instead of trying to squeeze them into the available space you ought to be thinking ‘how much space do I need?’ and finding a site which can accommodate the clamp.
Build the clamp so it is not facing into the wind, try to build it across the wind. This helps to avoid wind blowing on to the silage face, and ripping off the covers, which can make a big difference when trying to minimise unnecessary work.
Be conscious of how the clamp will be filled. If it takes three days to fill a clamp and cover it, then it is probably too big. The silage put in the clamp on the first morning will be degrading by the time the clamp is covered.
Ideally it should be possible to fill a clamp in one day, and get it covered by the end of the day, which means taking into consideration the dimensions to make this possible.
If the harvest window is five days, really one clamp is not enough and you ought to be looking at putting in two or three, with the idea of having at least one of them covered per day.”
For more information… www.arkagriculture.com ask to speak to Will Wilson
Above information was originaly written for Farmers Guardian 10/9/18